🔍 Read the full analysis: SEC Filings And Humanoid Robots: 52 Mentions Call For A Careful Read on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
ThorstenMeyerAI.com says its search of SEC EDGAR found 52 companies mentioning “humanoid” in 163 filings submitted from Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026, compared with 17 companies in all of 2025 and six in 2024. The count covers builders, suppliers, blank-check companies and incidental references; a mention alone does not show that a company has robots in operation or is earning revenue from them.
ThorstenMeyerAI.com reported Nov. 2 that a search of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings found 52 companies mentioning “humanoid” in filings submitted from Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026. The count signals wider use of the term in corporate disclosures, but the report’s review says those mentions range from robotics businesses to suppliers and passing references, so the figure does not establish how many companies have commercial humanoid robots or related revenue.
The publication says it searched the SEC’s EDGAR full-text system for the word “humanoid” in 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and S-1 filings, including amendments and exhibits. It reports 186 matching documents in 163 filings from 52 companies. The count treats each SEC registrant as one company and each filing accession number as one filing, even if it contains multiple documents.
For comparison, the same search method found 17 companies in all of 2025 and six in 2024. These are raw counts of companies with matches, not a measure of investment, shipments, revenue or operating robots. ThorstenMeyerAI.com said its total differs from an Inc. column published Nov. 1, which reported 47 companies; the publication attributes the likely gap to differences in filing types and the date window.
After reading the sentences around the matches, the report classified nine companies as building, selling or owning a humanoid maker. It grouped 31 as suppliers, customers or companies discussing the market, six as blank-check companies and six as incidental mentions. Those categories represent the publication’s interpretation of filings, not official SEC classifications. Faraday Future alone accounted for 35 of the 163 filings, according to the report, illustrating how repeated filings by one registrant can affect document totals.
Infographic 01 · The word is spreading
52 companies said “humanoid” in SEC filings this year
We ran the search ourselves: three times as many companies as in all of 2025, and almost nine times as many as in 2024.
Companies mentioning “humanoid”
10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1 incl. amendments and exhibits, by filing year (2026: to 1 Nov)
The blockchain wave
Companies mentioning “blockchain” in the same forms
Mentions did not fall after the 2018 crypto crash. A rising count alone is not a bubble signal; the gap between words and business is.
How we counted
- Query: humanoid (catches “robot”, “robots”, “robotics”). The exact phrase “humanoid robot” alone: 18 companies.
- Forms: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1, each with amendments; every matching document, including exhibits.
- Period: filing dates 1 Jan to 1 Nov 2026; earlier years by calendar year.
- Counting: one company per SEC registrant number (CIK). Faraday Future alone: 35 of 163 filings.
- Inc. reported 47 companies. Likely a different form set or date window; same direction.
Source: SEC EDGAR full-text search, run 2 Nov 2026 (an all-forms search finds 272 entities, mostly investment funds listing humanoid-robotics ETFs; excluded). Tip: Inc., 1 Nov 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Why Filing Mentions Need Scrutiny
The count matters as a measure of how often humanoid robotics is entering public-company disclosure, but it is not evidence that the sector has reached broad commercial deployment. Companies can mention a market to describe a product opportunity, a supplier relationship, a risk or a potential acquisition. Those uses carry different implications for investors, employees and customers.
The report points to a wide gap between promotional language and disclosed business activity. It says Faraday Future recorded $853,000 in second-quarter robotics revenue from humanoids and four-legged robots combined. It also says the company that bought its robot business expects more than 1,100 cumulative shipments, while a prospectus filed seven weeks earlier described two paid orders for its robot-sharing platform worth about $5,000 in total. These figures concern different disclosures and products, and the source does not provide enough detail here to reconcile them as a single sales measure.
Supplier references can also vary in substance. ThorstenMeyerAI.com cites Vishay Precision’s report of a vendor nomination letter from an initial humanoid-robotics customer as a specific commercial step. By contrast, a filing that lists humanoids alongside several other possible growth markets does not, by itself, show a contract or sales. Readers need to check what each company actually disclosed rather than treating a mention as a business milestone.
Products Worth Considering
Bose SoundLink Flex Bluetooth Speaker (2nd Gen), Waterproof, Dustproof, USB‑C, Up to 12 hr Battery, Black
Apple Watch Series 8 GPS, 41mm, Midnight Aluminum Case with Midnight Sport Band (S/M)
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Noise-Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the 2026 Count Was Built
The tally followed an Inc. column published Nov. 1 with a headline saying 47 companies were mentioning humanoid robots in SEC filings. ThorstenMeyerAI.com says that column prompted its own search; it did not use the column as the source for the count. Its search was run on Nov. 2 and covered filings dated Jan. 1 to Nov. 1, 2026, using the term “humanoid” rather than the exact phrase “humanoid robot.” The report says the exact phrase alone returned 18 companies, because it does not capture all variations in wording.
The selection of filing types affects the result. The search included annual, quarterly, current and registration filings, plus amendments and exhibits. The publication says searching all form types instead produced 272 entities, largely because fund holdings lists included humanoid-robotics exchange-traded funds. It excluded those results. The source’s comparisons with 2024 and 2025 used the same selected forms, according to its description.
The report also places the current attention alongside earlier waves of corporate buzzwords. It cites research on dot-com company name changes and describes a 2017 beverage-company pivot to blockchain, as well as SEC “AI washing” cases in 2024 and 2025. These examples are historical context, not proof that current humanoid-related disclosures are misleading. The report also notes examples it says indicate real, though limited, activity: Agility Robotics reports nine customer facilities and 65,000 hours of operation; Tesla says Optimus production has begun in Fremont but gives no unit count.
“A word in a filing is not a robot in a warehouse.”
— ThorstenMeyerAI.com
What the Count Cannot Establish
The total is a self-reported search and classification by ThorstenMeyerAI.com, not an SEC tally. The source provides its search terms, forms, dates and counting rules, but the material supplied does not include a company-by-company table or independent verification of every result. The precise reason for the difference from Inc.’s 47-company count is described as likely, not confirmed.
Most importantly, the number does not show how many companies have functioning humanoids, customer deployments, recurring orders or material robotics revenue. The source’s categories are based on its reading of filing language, and some disclosures may fit more than one description. It is also unclear from the supplied material how revenue and shipment figures cited for particular businesses compare across product lines, time periods or definitions.
The historical comparisons do not establish that a humanoid-robotics disclosure is deceptive or that a company’s stock will rise or fall. The report itself says it is a reading of public documents, not investment advice. Assessing any specific claim would require checking the original filing, related company announcements and subsequent financial results.
Checking Filings Against Results
The next useful test is whether companies that mention humanoids disclose concrete milestones in later filings: named customer agreements, paid orders, shipment totals, production capacity and revenue tied specifically to humanoid products. Readers can also compare current statements with earlier filings to see whether projections have changed or been narrowed.
For this count, the reported search ends on Nov. 1, 2026; the publication’s article is dated Nov. 2. A later search could add companies or filings, but no updated total or follow-up dataset is provided in the source material. Until then, the 52-company figure should be read as a dated count of filings containing a term—not a count of deployed robots or proven businesses.
Key Questions
What does the figure of 52 companies measure?
It is ThorstenMeyerAI.com’s count of SEC registrants with at least one filing containing the word “humanoid” in selected 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K or S-1 filings dated Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026. It does not measure robot shipments, revenue or deployments.
Why is the count different from the 47 reported by Inc.?
ThorstenMeyerAI.com says the gap is likely due to differences in filing types and the date window. The source does not confirm the exact cause or provide a direct reconciliation of the two counts.
Do all 52 companies make humanoid robots?
No. The report classified nine as building, selling or owning a humanoid maker. It placed many others among suppliers, customers or companies discussing the market, while some mentions were incidental or came from blank-check companies.
Does a filing mention prove a company has humanoid-robot revenue?
No. A mention can describe a potential market, supplier relationship, risk or planned transaction. Investors would need to review the specific filing and financial disclosures for evidence of orders, shipments or revenue.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
