🔍 Read the full analysis: Why We’re Using A UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro With Our AI Fleet on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
ThorstenMeyerAI.com says it bought a UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro after duplicate iCloud backup files left one server with 2% free disk space. The NAS has been equipped but is not yet connected or configured; its planned RAID 6 storage and backup safeguards remain untested.
ThorstenMeyerAI.com has bought a UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro after duplicate files created by an iCloud sync workflow left its database server with just 2% free disk space. The NAS has been delivered and fitted with drives, but it is not yet on the network, and the planned setup and acceptance tests have not taken place.
The site’s account says that on September 17, two machines uploaded database dumps with the same filename to an iCloud folder. The service produced 29 conflict copies, bringing the server close to full. On October 29, a separate cleanup job for old dump files timed out while iCloud was busy. The publisher says the backup itself was intact in that incident, but managing the copies had failed.
The purchased system is a six-bay UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro, with four Seagate IronWolf Pro 16 TB hard drives and one NVMe SSD. The planned arrangement is four disks in RAID 6, which the publisher estimates would provide about 32 TB of usable capacity and tolerate the failure of two drives. The SSD is intended for containers and test databases. These are planned configurations, not operating results.
The operation says it currently needs about 6 to 8 TB for backups. Its October 6 measurements put storage use at about 2.6 TB on its main desk machine, 744 GB on the database server, and 3.2 TB on the model server. Much of the model-server data consists of AI model files that can be downloaded again, according to the publisher.
Infographic 01 · The box
Six bays, two fast slots, two 10GbE ports
What UGREEN lists for the NASync DXP6800 Pro, and how we plan to fill it.
How we fill it
Delivered and equipped; the setup is our plan (1 Nov 2026)
Bays 1–4: Seagate IronWolf Pro 16 TB, RAID 6, Btrfs → ≈ 32 TB usable, any two drives may fail. Bays 5–6: free for growth. M.2 slot 1: the NVMe SSD (ordered: Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB) as its own fast pool. Slot 2: free. Six 16 TB drives in RAID 6 would give ≈ 64 TB.
What else UGREEN lists
From the product page, not measured by us
- Separate 128 GB SSD for the operating system, UGOS
- RAID: JBOD, Basic, 0, 1, 5, 6, 10
- 1× PCIe x4 · 2× Thunderbolt 4 · 8K HDMI · SD card reader
- Power: 43.07 W drives in use · 24.91 W drives in hibernation
- Stated maximum: 208 TB with 32 TB drives · 3-year warranty
Why six bays: with RAID 6, two drives always hold parity. In four bays that leaves half the raw space usable; with all six bays filled it becomes two thirds.
Sources: UGREEN DXP6800 Pro product page, checked 1 Nov 2026; Seagate IronWolf Pro data sheet DS2129.4; our setup plan, 6 Oct 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
A Local Copy for Faster Recovery
The purchase addresses a practical weakness in the operation’s existing backup route: a sync service can reproduce unwanted changes, while restoring a large amount of data from cloud storage may take hours over a home-office connection. A network-attached storage device could provide a nearby copy for quicker recovery and keep backup storage separate from the Macs that run the publishing system and AI workloads.
That benefit is still prospective. The NAS cannot prevent the recurring kernel panics the publisher reports on its database Mac, and a local copy alone would not protect against a serious incident affecting the office and its equipment. The planned offsite copy is meant to address that separate risk. Whether the new arrangement is faster, more reliable, or quieter will depend on tests and use after installation.
Products Worth Considering
Apple MacBook Air 13-inch with M5 chip, 16GB memory, 1TB SSD, and 12MP Center Stage camera (Midnight)
Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (2026) with M5 chip, 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, Silver
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Sync Conflicts to NAS Purchase
The publisher describes a small fleet of Macs: one holds the main Postgres database, another runs local AI models, and others handle content pipelines and tests. It reports recurring kernel panics on the database machine since August, with one August 8 crash causing 2¼ hours of database downtime. A NAS would not stop hardware or operating-system failures, but a nearby backup could potentially shorten restoration time.
The owner says the six-bay model was chosen over a cheaper four-bay option for room to add drives without replacing existing ones. UGREEN’s product specifications, as cited by the publisher, list a 10-core Intel Core i5-1235U, two M.2 slots, two 10GbE ports and 8 GB of DDR5 memory expandable to 64 GB. Those are manufacturer specifications, not independently tested performance results.
The site says the hardware, drives and SSD were bought with the owner’s money; UGREEN did not provide a sample or sponsor the article, and there are no affiliate links. The publisher also says this is not a review or long-term test. Its account is a purchase rationale and a description of a proposed deployment.
“That was the day I stopped treating a sync service as a backup.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Deployment and Safeguards Still Untested
As of November 1, 2026, the NAS has not been connected to the network or configured. The two stated acceptance tests—Time Machine backups using a non-admin account and snapshots that the account cannot access or delete—have not run. The RAID arrangement, drive-sleep schedule, restore speed and backup reliability are also unverified.
The planned safeguards include separate Mac accounts with quotas, daily snapshots, and an encrypted offsite copy using restic to Backblaze B2 with Object Lock. The publisher says it will not give AI agents administrator credentials, expose the NAS for internet access, or treat UGREEN’s cloud mirror as its offsite backup. It remains unclear whether all parts of this design will work as intended once configured.
The owner also says current backups remain on local Time Machine disks and as an iCloud copy of the nightly database dump. The article does not report that the NAS has already improved recovery or resolved the earlier storage and cleanup problems.
Acceptance Tests Before Rollout
The next step is to connect and configure the NAS, then run the two acceptance tests. The owner says the unit will be returned if either test fails. If it passes, the planned rollout would use the hard drives for backups and the SSD for containers and test databases, with disk-heavy work scheduled overnight from 20:00 to 06:00.
The publisher says it plans to report results after the system is running. Those results will be needed to establish whether the setup provides reliable snapshots, workable restores and the intended separation between local and offsite copies.
Key Questions
Has the UGREEN NAS been installed and tested?
No. As of November 1, 2026, the NAS has been delivered and fitted with drives, but it is not connected to the network or configured. Its acceptance tests have not been run.
Why did the publisher buy a NAS?
The site says duplicate iCloud conflict copies left its database server with 2% free disk space, and a later cleanup job timed out. It wants a local backup destination that may be faster to restore from than cloud storage.
How much storage is planned?
The planned setup uses four 16 TB drives in RAID 6, which the publisher estimates will provide about 32 TB usable. The site says its current backup need is about 6 to 8 TB.
What safeguards does the proposed setup include?
The plan calls for separate non-admin backup accounts with quotas, daily snapshots, and an encrypted offsite copy to Backblaze B2 using restic and Object Lock. These safeguards have not yet been tested on the NAS.
Will the NAS fix the database server’s crashes?
No such claim is made. The publisher reports recurring kernel panics on the database Mac and says a NAS cannot prevent a crash; it may help shorten recovery if a restore from local storage is faster.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
