🔍 Read the full analysis: IT Staff Augmentation Vs Full-Time Hiring: A Rate-Based Cost Comparison on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
A November 6, 2026 analysis by Thorsten Meyer compares the estimated employer cost of full-time developers with outside specialists using public wage and labor-cost data. It calculates a U.S. break-even rate of about $98 per hour for a one-year hire at full utilization, rising to about $197 when only half of the hire’s time is needed; it does not provide market rates for staffing providers.
Thorsten Meyer published a rate-based comparison on November 6 estimating what full-time developers cost employers per hour actually worked, then calculating when outside staff augmentation may be less expensive. Using public U.S. and German labor-cost figures, the analysis puts a median U.S. developer’s employer cost at about $95 per hour worked before hiring costs, and gives a one-year U.S. break-even rate of about $98 an hour under its assumptions.
The calculation starts with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ June 2026 employer-cost data. For management, professional and related occupations, employers paid $78.88 per hour worked, including $54.06 in wages. Meyer uses the relationship between wages, paid leave and other benefits to estimate a load factor of about 1.28. Applying it to the BLS median software developer wage of $135,980 in May 2025 produces an estimated annual employer cost of roughly $175,000. Dividing by an estimated 1,830 hours actually worked yields approximately $95 an hour.
For Germany, the analysis cites Destatis data showing €29 in non-wage labor costs per €100 of gross earnings in 2025. Employers in the information and communication sector paid an average of €58.50 per hour worked, up from €49 in 2020. Meyer cautions that this German figure covers a broad sector, while the U.S. estimate is based on a specific occupation’s median wage; they are not directly equivalent salary benchmarks.
To account for recruitment, Meyer uses SHRM’s 2025 average cost per hire of $5,475 for non-executive roles. Assuming a one-year tenure, the calculation adds about $3 per worked hour, taking the U.S. estimate to approximately $98. Spread over three years, the hiring cost adds less per hour and the estimate is about $96. SHRM’s reported median cost per hire was $1,200; the figures cover roles generally, not technology hiring alone.
Infographic 01 · The true cost of a hire
A salary is not the cost
Before you compare a hire with an outside specialist, convert both into the same unit: cost per hour of real work.
What a median US software developer costs the employer per hour actually worked. Our calculation from BLS wage and employer-cost data.
From salary to hourly cost
Calculation, each input published by the BLS
- Median salary, US software developer (May 2025)$135,980
- × 1.28 employer costs on top (benefits, insurance, retirement, payroll taxes)$174,600
- ÷ hours actually worked (2,080 paid, about 12% paid leave)1,830 h
- Cost per hour actually worked≈ $95
Sources: BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026, Table 4 · BLS median wage, software developers, May 2025 · Destatis, 29 Apr 2026 · Destatis non-wage labour costs · SHRM 2025 benchmarking. Load factor = total compensation ÷ (wages + paid leave) = $78.88 ÷ $61.43. German sector figure covers all jobs in the sector, not only developers.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
How Utilization Changes the Rate
The analysis’s central point is that the relevant comparison is not salary against a contractor’s hourly quote. It is the cost per useful hour of a full-time employee against the outside rate, with employer benefits, paid leave, recruitment and the amount of work available included. A hire who is needed only part of the time still incurs ongoing employment costs, making each productive hour more expensive.
Meyer’s example puts the U.S. break-even rate at about $98 per hour when a hire is fully utilized for a year. If the employee is needed for only half of their available hours, the estimate rises to about $197 per useful hour. That difference can alter a project budget or sourcing decision, though the figure is a scenario calculation, not a quoted staffing-market rate.
The comparison also highlights costs that are harder to express as an hourly rate. Meyer says hiring may suit long-running core work when a person can remain busy and the organization needs to retain knowledge. Augmentation may fit short, uncertain or specialist assignments. Those are decision factors, not findings that one approach is always cheaper.
Products Worth Considering
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Wi-Fi Tablet, 8.7-Inch, 64GB, 4GB RAM, Gray (SM-X133, International Version)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7-Inch 32GB Wi-Fi Tablet, Gray
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Public Data, Not Vendor Quotes
Meyer says he used publicly available figures and stated assumptions, rather than market-rate surveys or prices from staffing firms. He explains that agency rates vary and that he did not find a published rate survey with a sufficiently clear method. Readers are invited to use the calculation with actual provider quotes and their own hiring inputs.
The measures have different scopes. The U.S. BLS figures combine a May 2025 occupational wage with June 2026 benefit-cost data. The German Destatis figure is an average for the information and communication sector in 2025, not a developer-only rate. SHRM’s hiring-cost benchmark covers non-executive roles across organizations. These differences mean the results are useful as starting points for a repeatable calculation, not precise, like-for-like international comparisons.
The source also discusses AI, but does not assign a productivity multiplier. Meyer says evidence about how much coding agents speed up developers remains unsettled. He argues that AI may create demand for short specialist projects while also giving employers another reason to retain technical knowledge internally; those points are his interpretation, not measured findings in the cost calculation.
“The break-even rate, the highest hourly rate an outside specialist can cost before hiring becomes the cheaper option.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Inputs That Could Shift the Result
The break-even numbers depend on assumptions about utilization, tenure and hours actually worked. The source’s one-year and three-year examples use an average hiring cost; a particular organization’s recruiting expense, benefits, compensation, leave, turnover and project workload may differ. The article does not provide a universal staffing rate or establish that a quoted contractor is interchangeable with a full-time employee.
The underlying benchmarks also do not match perfectly across countries or time periods. The U.S. estimate combines wage and employer-cost data from different dates, while Germany’s sector figure includes roles beyond software developers. The source does not specify a single exchange rate for comparing the dollar and euro amounts. It also says the productivity effect of coding agents remains unsettled, so AI-related changes to the inputs cannot be quantified from this analysis.
Apply the Formula to Real Quotes
The next step proposed by Meyer is for employers to enter their own hiring assumptions and the actual hourly quotes they have received. A meaningful comparison should use the same role and project scope, estimate how many hours of work are genuinely available, and account for the expected employment period and organization-specific hiring costs.
The source does not announce a follow-up benchmark or a provider-rate survey. Its accompanying explainer video presents the calculation, while the article says it is not legal, tax or financial advice. Any decision based on the estimates will depend on local employment rules, the specific role and the employer’s own cost data.
Key Questions
What is the estimated cost of a full-time U.S. developer?
Meyer estimates about $95 per hour actually worked for a median U.S. software developer, before adding recruitment costs. The calculation uses the BLS May 2025 median wage and employer-cost data.
What does break-even rate mean here?
It is the outside specialist’s hourly rate at which the estimated cost of hiring and employing someone becomes comparable. Meyer’s U.S. example estimates about $98 an hour for a one-year hire at full utilization, including an average recruitment cost.
Why does low utilization raise the break-even rate?
A full-time employee’s employment costs continue even when there is less work to do. In Meyer’s example, needing a hire for only half of their available hours raises the estimated cost to about $197 per useful hour.
Does the article show that staff augmentation is always cheaper?
No. It provides a calculation method, not a universal verdict or a survey of staffing-provider prices. The result depends on the actual quote, workload, hiring costs, expected tenure and other assumptions.
How does the analysis account for AI coding tools?
It does not apply a productivity multiplier. Meyer says evidence on how much coding agents speed up developers remains unsettled, and treats AI as a factor that may change project needs and knowledge-retention decisions.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
